Does the Federal Arbitration Act (9 U.S.C. ? 2), as interpreted in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion (2011) 563 U. S. __, 131 S.Ct. 1740, preempt state law rules invalidating mandatory arbitration provisions in a consumer contract as procedurally and substantively unconscionable?The Court's web page for Mayers is here. The page for Sanchez is here.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
Mayers v. Volt Management: California Supreme Court Grants Review in Arbitration Case
No rest for the weary. I just blogged this case, and now the Supreme Court has granted review. In Mayers v. Volt Management (discussed here), the Supreme Court has granted review and deferred briefing pending its decision in
Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co. LLC, S199119, which includes the following issue:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.